I have an early-springtime ritual that I perform several days each week. I call it Running the Potholes. The route to my office includes a short street with concrete pavement, and potholes open up like crocuses this time of year.
Every seam in the pavement is lined with a string of cracks, depressions and gaping chasms. Hitting one can be a bone-jarring, teeth-rattling experience. Trying to avoid the hazards makes me feel like Han Solo piloting the Millennium Falcon through as asteroid field. (OK, so it’s not all bad.)
However, hitting a large pothole can do serious damage to your car and can even cause an accident. When this happens, is the city or the county liable for failing to maintain the road? As with most legal questions, the answer is, “it depends.”
The State of Ohio decided long ago that it generally is not responsible for anything that it does or fails to do. The Ohio Revised Code says that the State and all of its political subdivisions are not liable for damage to people or property caused in connection with the performance of a governmental function.
There are a few exceptions to this rule, though. The government can be sued for injuries or damages resulting from a “negligent failure to keep public roads in repair and other negligent failure to remove obstructions from public roads.”
OK, so you hit a pothole, swerve and hit a tree. The city or the county is liable for failing to repair the road, right? Maybe. Remember, the government is liable for negligent failure to keep public roads in repair. In order to prove the government was negligent, you have to show that it knew or should have known about the problem, and that it failed to correct it within a reasonable time.
Obviously, if someone complained to the government about the pothole (hopefully in writing), it will be easy to prove that the government knew about the problem. If the entire street is a minefield of potholes, I would argue that a complaint about one pothole should put the government on notice regarding the entire street.
But the city or the county does not have to have actual notice; it can also have something called “constructive notice.” If a large pothole existed for weeks on a street that city vehicles use every day, a city cannot claim that it did not know about the problem. Somebody in the city’s employ should have brought the issue to the city’s attention.
Unfortunately, if you are injured or your car is damaged due to a pothole, you may not know whether the government can be sued until you have done a lot of investigation into how long the pothole existed, who knew about it and whether anyone complained before your accident.
Even if you can show that the city or the county had notice, you can almost bet that your claim will be denied on the grounds that you were at fault for hitting such an open and obvious hazard. (I mean, you just admitted it was a HUGE freakin’ pothole.) That’s not to say that you can’t win such a claim, but the damage has to be pretty severe to make the effort worthwhile.
If you would like to help protect yourself and other drivers, take a moment to put your city or county on notice when you see a dangerous road condition. A simple email can go a long way toward getting the problem fixed. It can also go a long way toward holding the government responsible if its failure to act causes an accident.
Have a question or a suggestion for a topic? Email dspirgen@SpirgenLawFirm.com.
Patch posts are general discussions and should not be used as advice on any specific legal matter. If you need legal advice on a particular situation, please consult an attorney.
Mark Zetzer
9:05 am on Friday, March 15, 2013
Thanks for the tip Dennis. I'll be sure to alert my local public works department about specific road hazards. I try to make a game out of dodging potholes (which exist year round here in Shaker Heights, not just in the spring). It's a great excuse to play with my vehicle's tight steering. But I still end up hitting a few gaping craters and, speaking for the car, exclaim an audible "ouch"!
Do you know what the liability for road hazard damage and injury is on private roads? I would think that private road owners would want to promote maximum use in order to collect more tolls, and would do everything they could to prevent potholes from occuring or repair them quickly when they do. I don't know of any private roads in NEO, but other states have them such as the Dulles Greenway in Virginia (http://dullesgreenway.com/). I sure wish there were private roads here, to let drivers see the stark difference between public and private sector costs and quality.
Dennis Spirgen
11:01 pm on Friday, March 15, 2013
I can't speak to the law in Virginia, but the operator of a private road does not have governmental immunity, so general negligence law would apply. He would be obligated to use reasonable care to keep the roadway in good repair.
Jesse
10:39 am on Friday, March 15, 2013
Yep. "The King can do no wrong." Sovereign immunity is hard to beat. I've had some victories on the issue in my practice, but more losses. I had one case go to the Ohio Supreme Court, but the only receptive ear was Justice Pfeifer. Plus, you have the premises liability defenses that favor the landowner. I should clarify, these were not based on potholes.
ACE
7:48 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013
I hate my local and state gov. So much more After reading this.
ACE
7:50 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013
Makes me like my city and state so much more after reading this.